U.S. Miles Ahead in Global Shale Race
By IER, Institute for Energy Research, May 11, 2015
Despite the large technically recoverable resources for shale oil and gas worldwide, only 4 countries have actually produced commercial quantities of oil and natural gas from shale formations. There are an estimated 7,299 trillion cubic feet of shale gas resources (the world consumes about 120 trillion cubic feet per year) and 345 billion barrels of shale oil (tight oil) resources worldwide, but only the United States and Canada have produced commercial quantities of both shale oil and shale gas. In the meantime, China produced a smidgen of shale gas and Argentina produced a smidgen of shale oil in 2014. Out of the four countries, only the United States is a major producer of both shale oil and gas. Other countries with shale resource exploration efforts underway include Algeria, Australia, Colombia, Mexico, and Russia. However, these countries have not demonstrated the logistics and infrastructure necessary to support commercial exploration and production, nor do they have national policies regarding ownership of mineral rights, regulations, and taxes that are conducive for commercial resource development.
[Screen Shot 2015-05-11 at 10.53.55 AM]
Source: Energy Information Administration, http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=19991
Global Shale Oil and Gas Resource Assessment
Advanced Resources International (ARI) assessed global shale oil and gas resources for the Energy Information Administration in 137 shale formations in 41 countries outside the United States. The company found technically recoverable resources of 345 billion barrels of shale oil and 7,299 trillion cubic feet of shale gas worldwide. Russia has the largest technically recoverable resources of shale oil at 75 billion barrels, followed by the United States with 58 billion barrels, China with 32 billion barrels and Argentina with 27 billion barrels. China leads the world in technically recoverable resources of shale gas at 1,115 trillion cubic feet, followed by Argentina with 802 trillion cubic feet, Algeria with 707 trillion cubic feet, the United States with 665 trillion cubic feet, and Canada with 573 trillion cubic feet. Globally, 32 percent of the total estimated natural gas resources are in shale formations, while 10 percent of estimated oil resources are in shale or tight formations.[i]
Source: Energy Information Administration, http://www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/worldshalegas/
Technically recoverable resources represent the volumes of oil and natural gas that could be produced with current technology, regardless of price and production costs; while economically recoverable resources are resources that can be profitably produced under current market conditions. The economic recoverability of oil and natural gas resources depends on the costs of drilling and completing wells, the amount of oil or natural gas produced from the well over its lifetime, and the prices received for the oil and gas produced. Economic recoverability of shale oil and gas resources are influenced by geology; private ownership of subsurface rights; availability of independent operators and contractors with expertise and drilling rigs; pipeline infrastructure; and the availability of water resources for use in hydraulic fracturing.
Worldwide Production of Shale Oil and Gas
Because shale oil and gas have proven to be quickly producible in large volumes at relatively low cost in the United States, shale oil and shale gas resources have spurred an oil and natural gas production renaissance in this country. In 2013, shale oil provided 42 percent of total U.S. crude oil production and shale gas provided 47 percent of total U.S. natural gas production. However, because of the geologic variation of the world’s shale formations and the nationalization of the oil and gas industries, unhelpful regulatory environment, and tax regimes in other countries, the economic recoverability of shale resources is not as advantageous as in the United States and Canada. The production of shale resources is dependent on the production costs, recoverable volumes, wellhead prices and land ownership of the country where it is being produced.
Land ownership plays an enormous role in production, as can be seen by the example of the United States. Where the federal government owns land, oil production is down by 10 percent and natural gas production is down 31 percent since fiscal year 2010. Where nonfederal lands are involved, production of principally shale gas and oil has been skyrocketing, with oil up 89 percent and natural gas up by 37 percent since fiscal year 2010.[ii]
The United States, Canada, China, and Argentina are currently the only four countries that produce commercial volumes of shale oil or shale gas. In the United States, a large portion of shale gas production is from the Appalachian Basin’s Marcellus Shale where gas production has more than tripled in the past three years from 4.8 billion cubic feet per day in 2011 to 14.6 billion cubic feet per day in 2014. U.S. shale oil production comes mainly from the Western Gulf Basin’s Eagle Ford and the Williston Basin’s Bakken Shale. Oil production in the Bakken region averaged 1.1 million barrels per day in 2014, more than 2.5 times greater than the 2011 average of 0.4 million barrels per day.[iii]
In Canada, tight oil production doubled between 2011 and 2014, from 0.2 million barrels per day to 0.4 million barrels per day, coming mainly from Alberta and Saskatchewan. Canadian shale gas production increased from 1.9 billion cubic feet per day in 2011 to 3.9 billion cubic feet per day by in May 2014. Note that the Canadian shale gas figures include production from the Montney formation, which is considered non-shale gas production by the Canadian National Energy Board, but which it includes in the Canadian shale gas production total.
In China, Sinopec and PetroChina reported commercial production of shale gas from fields in the Sichuan Basin. Their combined shale gas output totals 0.163 billion cubic feet per day (1.5 percent of total natural gas production). In Argentina, national oil company YPF, partnering with Chevron, is producing about 20,000 barrels of shale oil per day from the Loma Campana area.
Hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling have produced an oil and gas production renaissance in this country, with over 40 percent of their production coming from shale formations. However, in other countries, either the geology or other factors dealing with mineral rights, regulations, and taxes are not conducive to produce the same oil and gas production explosion. American ingenuity is continuing to make the technology more efficient and less expensive to produce so that we can enjoy the benefits of abundant and relatively inexpensive oil and gas.
U.S. Shale Production Set To Fall Again In July, EIA Says
By Collin Eaton, FuelFix.com, June 8, 2015
HOUSTON — The federal forecast of U.S. shale production is sinking again for the third month in a row, but the decline is still just a thin layer off the top.
Daily oil production at the nation’s six biggest shale plays is set to slip by 91,000 barrels from June to July, the Energy Information Administration says. That’s roughly 2 percent of the 5.48 million U.S. barrels anticipated next month, hardly the kind of decline oil-industry stakeholders had expected for after drillers sidelined nearly 1,000 oil-drilling rigs in the last six and a half months.
“It’s a pretty resilient industry,” said Bill Herbert, an analyst at Simmons & Co. International in Houston. And given the billions that oil producers have raised this year — they still have generous equity investors waiting in the wings — it’s not inconceivable that crude production could start to rise again early next year, especially with oil prices flirting with the $60-to-$65 a barrel range, Herbert said.
“If you send the right price signals, the oil producers are going to start reinvesting, and production will respond,” he said.
Oil traders are watching the shale industry and Baker Hughes’ U.S. rig count closely to see whether the nation’s production, which helped feed a glut of crude and send oil prices plummeting in the last 12 months, will ease up enough to lift prices again. Despite the falling rig count, not much has changed on the production side of the business, largely because oil companies are moving rigs to the sweetest shale acreage and because their rigs are more efficient, analysts say.
So far, falling production from older, deteriorating wells is outpacing the output from newly drilled wells, especially in the Eagle Ford Shale in South Texas, which is expected to see daily production decline by 49,000 barrels by July. Daily output at the Bakken Shale in North Dakota and the Niobrara formation in Colorado, Nebraska and surrounding states is supposed to fall by 29,000 and 17,000 barrels a day, respectively.
The Permian Basin in West Texas, so far the nation’s stalwart oil patch, still pumping out adding crude, is slipping close the point at which its net production will be in the red. Its month-over-month production is expected to be 3,000 barrels a day by July, the EIA estimates.
West Texas Intermediate, the U.S. benchmark crude, fell 99 cents to $58.14 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange. The international standard, Brent, dipped 62 cents to $62.69 on the ICE Futures Europe.
Meanwhile, the nation’s natural gas production is shrinking in all but the Utica Shale in Ohio. From Texas to Pennsylvania, old wells are expected to bring down gas production by 221 million cubic feet a day, or 0.5 percent of the nation’s gas output.
BP CEO: Shale revolution 'very painful' for much of world
By Katy Barnato, CNBC.COM, June 3, 2015
The shale gas revolution will be "very painful for many parts of the world," with the U.S. potentially the globe's new swing producer, the head of BP told CNBC on Tuesday.
The nascent shale industry—in which "unconventional" gas is drilled from the ground through hydraulic fracturing or "fracking"—is heavily dominated by the U.S. It has boomed in recent years, partly as a result of access to cheap financing, helping to push global oil prices to record lows.
BP CEO Bob Dudley told CNBC that the "revolution" meant the U.S. might supersede Saudi Arabia as the world's major swing oil producer, able to alter its production to balance supply and demand.
He saw the price of oil—which has recovered somewhat this year but is still down around 40 percent from the $100+ levels seen before July 2014—remaining "lower for longer."
Patrick Pouyanne, the CEO of French oil giant Total, added that there would be a "lag time" before declining production costs affected shale output.
"It will have an impact on the supply of U.S. shale oil or shale gas, but not immediately," he told CNBC at a seminar of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) on Wednesday in Vienna.
Dudley warned that there could be further consolidation in the energy industry if oil prices remained low, but that he saw BP as neither "predator nor prey" currently.
Along with shale gas production, the refusal of OPEC to cut production is viewed as a factor in the tumble in oil prices. The body will hold a key meeting on Friday at which it is expected, once again, to hold production at 30 million barrels of oil per day.
Dudley said that the "winners" from low oil prices were "clearly" importers like China, India, Indonesia and much of Europe. Even the U.S. was a beneficiary, he said, because the coastal states are predominately net importers of oil rather than exporters.
He added that BP intended to maintain its presence in Russia, despite tensions with the West, with no plans to sell its 20 percent stake in Rosneft. The Russia oil company is majority-owned by the Russian state and CEO Igor Sechin has close ties to Vladimir Putin.